I don't know if Bigfoot is real or not, I think he probably is, but who knows. I do know that after 30 yrs. of outdoors, I came across something a few days ago I have no explanation for. How egotistical do we have to be to believe we can't have an animal as elusive as Bigfoot, when most people live their whole lives living in cougar country without ever seeing one, an animal with a fraction of the intelligence of a primate.

Where was Barak Obama at the time of the sighting?

I'm just amazed that some anthropologist (or evolution apologist) hasn't found a bone somewhere from which they can reconstruct the entire beast.
Seems like there's a new dinosaur discovered fairly often, which leads them to tell us how many millions of years ago they lived, who they fought with, and what they had for lunch.
If we ever do find a bigfoot, the most valuable lesson we could learn would be how they managed to avoid cars all these years, and maybe we could teach deer (rabbits, raccoons, coyotes, mountain lions, etc) to do the same.
johnl

doubters drop dead! I'm heading there to win that $1 million bucks with the picture I take.

My bet is it was 3 people and a trail cam trying to win a million buck!

People disappear and are never found... so why couldn't a sasquatch roam around in the woods and never be found? Or hit by a car? I've never been hit by a car.

If you want a photo of a sasquatch come out to Minnesota. I've got lots of pictures of one in particular. Just give me a call and I'll make sure my sister in law is in town.

I can tell you first hand that I used to think it was all a hoax until I had a very personal encounter with on in the U.P. No I wasn't drunk and I was not smoking anything. I can tell you this,they are real, they are huge (the one I seen would make Darrel Dawkins look puny)and they mean us no harm other than scaring the wits out of us when we are fortunate to see one. If you don't believe me I'll be more than happy to sit you down on the stump where I saw the one I did and we'll see how long you stay a non-believer. Scary-scary stuff!

how many beers did this guy drink.
it even could have been a hungry bear that forgot to stop hibernatin or even the guy was out of touch of reality because he was reading to many PEOPLE magazines

Sorry, but all of you who are frothing at the mouth about the NRA's extreme propaganda read it with your minds closed. The "extreme" things in the press release were direct quotes of animal rights advocates who support the ND initiative. If you want to learn exactly how extreme, indeed how demented, animals rights activists are, read what the animal rights activists have to say. Also, check out Ted Kerasote's book Bloodties. He spent some time with Wayne Pacelle, who was then exective director of Fund For Animals and is now heading HSUS. He wants to end hunting, as do the groups themselves.

The ND initiative would effectively ban fee hunting of any "game animal" which at any time could have been considered "owned" by anyone, perhaps even if it had ever been confined to an enclosure. Read it and think about the consequences of those words becoming law.

Here in Colorado, the animal rights people came up with a bill during this session that both they and the gullible press promoted as being a ban on so-called "canned hunts." However, the language of the bill would have required livestock, which in Colorado includes two species of game animals which can be owned, to be taken to processing plant for slaughter and butchering. Farmers would not have been able to butcher their own livestock even for their own consumption. The promotion of the bill was obviously deceptive and it died a quick death. The ND initiative is not quite as deceptive, but it certainly bans more than "high fence" (it says any owned or contained animal) or canned hunts. (I grew up in Fargo, so I know that there's just too much available space for there to be much demand for such "hunts." Besides, what's the difference between the farmer slaughtering it himself or herself for sale or use or letting someone else do it for a little profit. It's not hunting but it's not immoral either -- that's where the deception lies. Should we charge farmers with misdemeaners for selling their own livestock? Ridiculous, isn't it?)

As far as I know, this is just another moral panic over nothing. Canned hunts are certainly not a problem here in Colorado even with our high number of hunters and competition for space. It seems like just another way of attacking hunters for being unfair and cruel wihout having to actually prove it -- and establishing a precedent for restricting hunting and property rights on purely emotional bases. And it attacks farmers for doing what they wish with their own livestock and own property. Why should hunters care about that? Actually, we dont' do we, but the animal rights people, who want us to all be vegetarians, do care and call it cruelty. That's another deception or at least moral error by the so-called Hunters for Fair Chase -- since it's not hunting for a farmer to do that, fair chase isn't an issue is it?

Sorry, all of you critics of the NRA -- you're wrong once again and the NRA is right. Remember, be sure of your target before you shoot of your mouth without having brain engaged. If you don't like being insulted, stop insulting an entire group -- your fellow Sportsmen and Sportswomen -- and get informed and do soemthing positive to support the sporting fraternity.

Here's what I don't understand:
Why is it that 'Brangelina' are getting paid 14 or 15 million for a pic of their newborns (of which there is irrefutable evidence they exist) and all someone gets for a pic of 'bigfoot' is only 1 million and a crummy t-shirt?
Am I the only one who sees something wrong with this?

I don't give a crap if they exist or not.Leave em alone until they start hurtin people then do something about it.If they wanted someones sorry ass then they would've already had it.